Tenancy and Agricultural Productivity in Southern India:Nature, Extent, Trends and Determinants

Authors

  • Uttam Deb Research Programme on Markets, Institutions and Policies, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru- 502 324, Telangana
  • Soumitra Pramanik Research Programme on Markets, Institutions and Policies, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru- 502 324, Telangana
  • Patan Elias Khan Research Programme on Markets, Institutions and Policies, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru- 502 324, Telangana
  • Cynthia Bantilan Research Programme on Markets, Institutions and Policies, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru- 502 324, Telangana

Abstract

The study reconfirmed prevalence of reverse tenancy in dryland agriculture in Southern India in recent years (2009-10 and 2011-12) as was in the mid-seventies. Household level panel data collected from six villages by ICRISAT under its Village Level Studies (VLS) and Village Dynamics Studies (VDS) programme were analysed. Area under tenancy has increased in recent years, mostly in the form of sharecropping. Panel Data Probit analysis revealed that likelihood of a household to be a tenant is positively linked with bullock ownership and large farm size while age and education of the household head, and dependence on non-farm income had a negative association. Determinants of extent of tenancy (rented in area) were measured through Panel Data Feasible Generalised Least Square (FGLS) regression analysis. Results indicated that an additional bullock increased rented-in area by 0.22 ha. On the other hand, large farmers had 0.47 ha more area under rented-in compared to other tenants. There was negative relationship between rented-in area and age and education of the household head indicating that educated and elderly people participated less in the tenancy market. Input use level, crop yield and profitability were generally higher in own land than that of rented-in land in the mid-seventies. In recent years, we observed mixed (inconclusive) outcome for input use, crop yield and profitability. Reduction of production risks in one of the study villages has not only reduced tenancy but also abolished reverse tenancy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Deb, U., Pramanik, S., Khan, P. E., & Bantilan, C. (2016). Tenancy and Agricultural Productivity in Southern India:Nature, Extent, Trends and Determinants. Journal of Rural Development, 35(3), 435–464. Retrieved from http://nirdprojms.in/index.php/jrd/article/view/104695

References

Ahmed, S (2011), “Determinants of the Choice of Agricultural Tenancy Contracts in Rural Bangladeshâ€, School of Economics, University of Adelaide.

Bardhan P (1978), “Variations in Extent and Forms of Agricultural Tenancy-I: Analysis of Indian Data Across Regions and Over Time†Economic and Political Weekly, September 11, 1978.

Bardhan P. K and A Rudra (1978), “Inter-linkage of Land Labour and Credit Relations: An Analysis of Village Survey Data in East Indiaâ€, Economic and Political Weekly, 13, pp. 167184.

Bharadwaj K (1974), "Production Conditions in Indian Agriculture", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bliss C. J and N. H Stern (1981), “Palanpur: Studies in the Economy of a North Indian Villageâ€.

Goswami, B and M. P Bezbaruah (2013), “Incidence, Forms and Determinants of Tenancy in the Agrarian Set-Up of the Assam Plainsâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, October 19, 2013, XLVIII, No. 42.

Hayami Y and K Otsuka (1993), “The Economics of Contract Choice: An Agrarian Perspectiveâ€, Oxford, Clarendon press.

Jodha N. S, M Asokan and J. G Ryan (1977), “Village Study Methodology and Resource Endowment of the Selected Villages in ICRISAT’s Village Level Studiesâ€, Economics Programme, Unpublished Occasional Paper, (16).

Jodha N. S (1981), “Agricultural Tenancy: Fresh Evidence from Dryland Areas in Indiaâ€, Economic and Political Weekly, December 1981, pp. A118-A128.

Jodha N. S (1984), “Agricultural Tenancy in Semi-arid Tropical Indiaâ€, Binswanger & Rosenzweig (1984), pp. 96-113.

Ladejinsky W (1965), “Agrarian Reform in Indiaâ€. In Agrarian Reform as Unfinished Business: The Selected Papers of Wolf Ladejinsky, Walinsky L.J, (Ed./s), (369-404); New York, Oxford University Press.

Myrdal G (1968), “Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nationsâ€, Vol. 2, New York, Pantheon.

Nasrin, M and M. T Uddin.(2013), “Land Tenure System and Agricultural Productivity in a Selected Area of Bangladeshâ€, Progressive Agriculture, 22(1-2), pp. 181-192.

Otsuka, K (2007), “Efficiency and Equity Effects of Land Marketsâ€, In Hand book of Agricultural Economics, Elsevier.

Otsuka K and Y Hayami (1988), “Theories of Share Tenancy: A Critical Surveyâ€, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Oct., 1988), pp. 31-68

Pant C (1981), “Tenancy in Semi-Arid Tropical Villages of South India: Determinants and Effects on Cropping Patterns and Input Use†PN-AAJ-907, Economics Programme Progress Report-20.

Radwan A. S (1987), “Testing between Competing Models of Sharecroppingâ€, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.95, No.5. (Oct.1987), pp. 893-920.

Singh N (1989), “Theories of Sharecroppingâ€, In P. Bardhan, The Economic Theory of Agrarian Institutions, New York, Oxford University Press.

Venkateswarlu, A. (2003), “Pattern of Land Distribution and Tenancy in Rural Andhra Pradeshâ€, (No. 51). Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad, India.

Vijay R and Y Sreenivasulu (2013), “Agrarian Structure and Land Lease Arrangements: An Investigation in Nine Villages in Andhra Pradeshâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, Vol. 48 No. 26 & 27, June 29, 2013.

Walker T and J Ryan (1990), “Villages and Household Economies in India’s Semi-arid Tropicsâ€, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Walker T. S, R. P Singh and V Ballabh (1988), “Agrarian Change, Farm Size, Tenancy and Land Fragmentation in India’s Semi-Arid Tropicsâ€, Reprinted from the Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Agricultural Economists Held at Buenos Aires, Argentina 24-31 August, 1988.