Understanding Socioeconomic Conditions of Rural Households


  • Mukesh Kumar Pandey Department of Economics, Government College, Ramanujganj- 497220, Dist -Balrampur, Chhattisgarh
  • Amit Bhushan Dwivedi Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science Institute, Allahabad, Jubi - 211019, Uttar Pradesh


Reflections of Indian economy expose paradoxical nature of Indian democracy. Rapid and steady growth with adverse socio-economic conditions has become an important attribute of Indian economy. A review of recently released Socio-Economic and Caste Census 2011 (SECC 2011) presents harsh realities of socio-economic conditions of the rural households. With an aim to understand socio-economic conditions of Empowered Actions Group of States (EAGS), this article, using SECC 2011, attempts to examine variations among States on the basis of income slab, income source and irrigated land ownership. Results suggest that a large number of EAGS households are engaged in subsistence work like manual casual labour and cultivation. SC households of rural India and particularly Bihar among EAG States are major social group relying greatly on subsistence wage labour. Severe lack of irrigated land ownership among SC/ST households leads them to engage in subsistence work and result is low income and social exclusion. Significance of SECC 2011 lies in the fact that it has reminded and reproduced an opportunity to rethink development strategies to ensure social justice in the country.


Download data is not yet available.




How to Cite

Pandey, M. K., & Dwivedi, A. B. (2016). Understanding Socioeconomic Conditions of Rural Households. Journal of Rural Development, 35(4), 599–619. Retrieved from http://nirdprojms.in/index.php/jrd/article/view/109024


Alkire S, S Seth (2013), “Identifying BPL Households: A Comparison of Methodsâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, 48(2), pp.49-57.

Bhagat, R B (2013), “Conditions of SC/ST Households: A Story of Unequal Improvementâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, 48(41), pp.62-66.

Dreze, J and R Khera (2015), “Understanding Leakages in the Public Distribution System,†Economic & Political Weekly, 50(7), pp.39-42.

Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (2015), “India Development Report 2015â€, (New Delhi, Oxford University Press).

Mahamalik, S and G B Sahu (2011), “Identification of the Poor: Errors of Exclusion and Inclusionâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, 46(9), pp.71-77.

Maiorano, D (2014), “Continuity aid Change in India`s Political Economy from 1980 to 2004â€, Economic & Political Weekly, 49(9), pp.44-54.

Ministry of Finance (2015), “Economic Survey 2014-15â€, Government of India, New Delhi.

Planning Commission (2011), “India Human Development Report 2011: Towards Social Inclusionâ€, (New Delhi, Oxford University Press).

Planning Commission (2014), “Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Measurement of Povertyâ€, (New Delhi, Government of India).

Radhakrishna R, C. Ravi and S. Reddy (2010), “Can We Really Measure and Identify the Poor When Poverty Encompasses Multiple Deprivationsâ€, Indian Journal of Human Development, 4(2), pp.282-300.

Saxena, N C (2015), “Socio-Economic Caste Census: Has It Ignored Too Many Poor Householdsâ€, Economic & Political Weekly, 50(30), pp.14-17.

World Bank (2015), http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india.