Harnessing Forest Rights for NTFP-Driven Livelihoods: Sustainable Pathways for the Kandha Community in Kalahandi, Odisha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2025/v44/i3/174144Keywords:
forest rights, non-timber forest products, kandha community, economic resilience, ecological conservationAbstract
This study investigates the influence of forest rights and non-timber forest products (NTFPs) on the livelihoods of the Kandha community in Kalahandi District, Odisha, India. The primary objectives are to identify key factors that enhance NTFP income and assess the impact of various types of forest rights on consumption patterns and income levels. Employing a descriptive survey method, research was conducted in six villages bordering the Karlapat Wildlife Sanctuary, an area known for its rich biodiversity and substantial tribal population. Data were gathered through household interviews and focus group discussions with diverse stakeholders, providing a thorough understanding of socio-economic profiles, forest dependency, and NTFP usage. A multi-stage sampling approach was implemented, involving 112 households. The findings indicate that households with Community Forest Rights experience higher NTFP income and exhibit more sustainable consumption patterns. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model identifies community rights, gender, affiliation with NTFP-specific institutions, frequency of forest visits, and proximity to forest resources as key determinants of NTFP income. This study underscores the pressing need for a more equitable distribution of forest rights and targeted interventions to enhance economic resilience and empower tribal communities that heavily rely on forest resources. The proposed policy measures aim to establish a sustainable framework that integrates ecological conservation with the livelihood needs of the Kandha community, fostering both environmental sustainability and economic stability.
Downloads
References
1. Aggarwal, A. (2011). Implementation of Forest Rights Act, changing forest landscape, and “politics of REDD+” in India. Journal of Resources, Energy and Development, 8(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/RED-120089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/RED-120089
2. Bhullar, L. (2008). The Indian Forest Rights Act 2006: A critical appraisal. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 4(1), 20. http://www.lead-journal.org/content/08020.pdf
3. Bose, I. (2010). How did the Indian Forest Rights Act, 2006, emerge? IPPG Discussion Paper No. 39.
4. Datta, A., & Köhlin, G. (2013). Tenure and forest management in India: Impacts on equity and efficiency of Van Panchayats in Uttarakhand. In S. T. Holden, K. Otsuka, & K. Deininger (Eds.), Land tenure reform in Asia and Africa (pp. xx–xx). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_10
5. Forest Survey of India. (2021). India state of forest report 2021. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2021
6. Gupta, D. (2019). Collective action for sustainable rural livelihoods: The case of Korchi Mahagramsabha. The Indian Journal of Social Work, 80(4), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.32444/IJSW.2019.80.4.517-524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32444/IJSW.2019.80.4.517-524
7. Gupta, D., Sinha, M., & Chhatre, A. (2022). India’s Forest Rights Act and indigenous claims to community forest resources: A case study of Lavari, Maharashtra. World Development Perspectives, 27, 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100449
8. Gupta, S., & Reddy, S. (2010). Community forest management in India: The role of community forest rights. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(4), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.013
9. Hajjar, R., Oldekop, J. A., Cronkleton, P., et al. (2021). A global analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests. Nature Sustainability, 4(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00633-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00633-y
10. Kothari, A., Singh, N., & Ghosh, P. (2012). Community conservation in India: Challenges and opportunities. Conservation & Society, 10(4), 262–274.
11. Kumar, K. (2024). Forest Rights Act 2006 and the question of traditional knowledge: A legal framework for forest management in India. In S. C. Rai & P. K. Mishra (Eds.), Sacred landscapes, indigenous knowledge, and ethno-culture in natural resource management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4206-6_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4206-6_10
12. Kumar, M., Phukon, S. N., & Singh, H. (2021). The role of communities in sustainable land and forest management. In P. K. Shit, H. R. Pourghasemi, P. P. Adhikary, G. S. Bhunia, & V. P. Sati (Eds.), Forest resources resilience and conflicts (pp. 305–318). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822931-6.00024-1
13. Lee, J. I., & Wolf, S. A. (2018). Critical assessment of implementation of the Forest Rights Act of India. Land Use Policy, 79, 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.024
14. Mahapatra, A. K., & Tewari, D. D. (2005). Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.02.002
15. Mia, M. T., Islam, M., Sakin, J., & Al-Hamadi, J. (2022). The role of community participation and community-based planning in sustainable community development. Asian People Journal, 5(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2022.5.1.296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2022.5.1.296
16. Mohanty, P. K., & Garada, R. (2016). Forest Rights Act & community conservation initiatives in Odisha: Exploring an alternative regime of forest governance. Journal of Politics & Governance, 5(3), 35–47.
17. Mohanty, P. K., & Garada, R. (2019). Understanding India’s forest land rights through spatial justice framework: A policy analysis of the Forest Rights Act 2006. International Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(2), 413–421.
18. Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D. (2022). A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development, 155, 105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
19. Pandey, A. K., Tripathi, Y. C., & Kumar, A. (2016). Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood: Challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2016.1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2016.1.7
20. Saha, D., & Sundriyal, R. C. (2012). Utilisation of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: Implications for management and livelihood. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.008
21. Saravanan, V. (2018). Impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006. In Environmental history and tribals in modern India. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8052-4_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8052-4_6
22. Sarin, M., Singh, N. M., Sundar, N., & Bhogal, R. K. (2003). Devolution as a threat to democratic decision-making in forestry? Findings from three states in India (Working Paper 197). Overseas Development Institute.
23. Sharma, A. B. (2017). The Indian Forest Rights Act (2006): A gender perspective. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 2(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632717716258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632717716258
