Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Total views : 373

Dialectics of Female Landownership: A Case Study in Deltaic Andhra, C.1866-2001

Affiliations

  • Economics Department in Rutgers University – Camden, New Jersey, United States
  • Economics Department in Rutgers University – Camden, New Jersey, United States

Abstract


It is well argued that unequal female landownership and lack of effective land rights are the most important factors affecting women's economic situation and persistence of gender gap. In this background, this article explores changing patterns of landownership of females historically with a contemporary relevance. An attempt is also made to understand the reasons affecting such a change in landownership in the village in general and castes in particular. Historically, it is understood that differences in landownership across castes by sex were attributed to varying marriage and dowry practices. The results indicate that most of the backward and scheduled castes started to emulate some of the marriage and dowry practices followed by forward castes. In spite of known and well documented evil effects of dowry and legislations against practice of dowry, if is observed that incidence of dowry is on rise in reality which is not a good solution for gender equality. In this background, an alternate policy solution is suggested by positively discriminating female buyers' with substantially discounted registration fees in land market transactions.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 2)

References


  • Agarwal, B. (1994), “A Field of Ones Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia”, New Delhi, Cambridge University Press.
  • Anderson, S. (2007), “The Economics of Dowry and Brideprice”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (4), 151 – 174.
  • Arunachalam, R., and Logan, T.D. (2008), “On the Heterogeneity of Dowry Motives”, Mimeo, University of Michigan.
  • Baden – Powell, B.H. (1896), “The Indian Village Community”, Reprint, Delhi, Cosmo Publications.
  • Balagangadhara Rao, Y. (2002), “Nama Vignanam”, Vijayawada: Nirmala Publications.
  • Cain, M.T. (1981), “Risk and Insurance: Perspectives on Fertility and Agrarian Change in India and Bangladesh”, Population and Development Review, Vol.7, No.3, .435-74.
  • Caplan, L. (1984), “Bridegroom Price in Urban India: Class”, Caste and ‘Dowry Evil’ Among Christians in Madras’, Man, 19, 216-233.
  • Caldwell, J., Reddy, P. and Caldwell, P. (1983), “The Causes of Marriage Change in South Asia”, Population Studies, 37 (3), 343-361.
  • Dasari, Babu N. S. ((2004), “Land Caste and Economic Mobility: A Study from Deltaic Andhra”, C. 1866-2001, PhD Thesis, Madras Institute of Development Studies, University of Madras.
  • Goody, J., and S.J. Tambiah (1973), “Dowry and Bridewealth and Property Rights of Women in South Asia”, in Goody J., and S.J. Tambiah: Bridewealth and Dowry: Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, No.7, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-169.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.