Dialectics of Female Landownership: A Case Study in Deltaic Andhra, C.1866-2001


  • Babu N. S. Dasari Economics Department in Rutgers University – Camden, New Jersey
  • Tetsuji Yamada Economics Department in Rutgers University – Camden, New Jersey


It is well argued that unequal female landownership and lack of effective land rights are the most important factors affecting women's economic situation and persistence of gender gap. In this background, this article explores changing patterns of landownership of females historically with a contemporary relevance. An attempt is also made to understand the reasons affecting such a change in landownership in the village in general and castes in particular. Historically, it is understood that differences in landownership across castes by sex were attributed to varying marriage and dowry practices. The results indicate that most of the backward and scheduled castes started to emulate some of the marriage and dowry practices followed by forward castes. In spite of known and well documented evil effects of dowry and legislations against practice of dowry, if is observed that incidence of dowry is on rise in reality which is not a good solution for gender equality. In this background, an alternate policy solution is suggested by positively discriminating female buyers' with substantially discounted registration fees in land market transactions.


Download data is not yet available.




How to Cite

Dasari, B. N. S., & Yamada, T. (2016). Dialectics of Female Landownership: A Case Study in Deltaic Andhra, C.1866-2001. Journal of Rural Development, 35(4), 531–553. Retrieved from http://nirdprojms.in/index.php/jrd/article/view/109020


Agarwal, B. (1994), “A Field of Ones Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asiaâ€, New Delhi, Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, S. (2007), “The Economics of Dowry and Bridepriceâ€, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (4), 151 – 174.

Arunachalam, R., and Logan, T.D. (2008), “On the Heterogeneity of Dowry Motivesâ€, Mimeo, University of Michigan.

Baden – Powell, B.H. (1896), “The Indian Village Communityâ€, Reprint, Delhi, Cosmo Publications.

Balagangadhara Rao, Y. (2002), “Nama Vignanamâ€, Vijayawada: Nirmala Publications.

Cain, M.T. (1981), “Risk and Insurance: Perspectives on Fertility and Agrarian Change in India and Bangladeshâ€, Population and Development Review, Vol.7, No.3, .435-74.

Caplan, L. (1984), “Bridegroom Price in Urban India: Classâ€, Caste and ‘Dowry Evil’ Among Christians in Madras’, Man, 19, 216-233.

Caldwell, J., Reddy, P. and Caldwell, P. (1983), “The Causes of Marriage Change in South Asiaâ€, Population Studies, 37 (3), 343-361.

Dasari, Babu N. S. ((2004), “Land Caste and Economic Mobility: A Study from Deltaic Andhraâ€, C. 1866-2001, PhD Thesis, Madras Institute of Development Studies, University of Madras.

Goody, J., and S.J. Tambiah (1973), “Dowry and Bridewealth and Property Rights of Women in South Asiaâ€, in Goody J., and S.J. Tambiah: Bridewealth and Dowry: Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, No.7, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-169.