Quality of Governance in Gram Panchayats: Evidence from Karnataka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2018/v37/i4/111388Keywords:
Decentralisation Governance in Karnataka, Participation in Gram Sabha, Participatory PlanningAbstract
The argument for decentralised governance has emerged on the premise that local government, located close to the people and thus having information advantage, is able to assess the situation of the people, identify and prioritise their needs, formulate plans that reflect the needs and aspirations of the people and implement them in an effective manner. In the Indian context, the Gram Sabha is an important institutional mechanism that will enable the people to participate in the identification and prioritisation of needs, preparation of plans according to needs and preferences of the people. In other words, quality of governance is promoted through the regular meetings of the Gram Sabha and other institutions. In this context, the paper discusses the quality of governance at the Gram Panchayat level in Karnataka with the help of data collected from five districts that are different in agro-climatic features and development status. The quality of governance is measured in terms of functioning of various statutory institutions in the Gram Panchayats such as Ward and Gram Sabha meetings, constitution and functioning of standing and other sub-committees, conduct of Panchayat meetings, etc. The paper concludes that there is some improvement in the governance in the last one decade or so. At the same time, there is much to be improved in terms of functioning of local institutions, awareness on these institutions and people’s participation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Aziz Abdul, N. Sivanna, M. Devendra Babu, Madhushree Sekher, C. Charles Nelson (2002), Decentralised Governance and Planning: A Comparative Study in Three South Indian States, Macmillan, New Delhi.
Babu, M. Devendra (2007), ‘Decentralised Planning in India: Are the Panchayati Raj Institutions Really Empowered?’ The Grassroots Governance Journal, Vol.V, No.2, December.
Babu, M. Devendra (2010), Decentralised Planning in Karnataka: Realities and Prospects, Social and Economic Change Monograph No.19, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangaluru.
Babu, M. Devendra, (2005), Decentralised Planning in Karnataka: An Impact Study, In: A C K Nambiar and C R Pathak (Eds.), Decentralised Planning and E-Governance in India: Problems and Prospects, Department of Economics, University of Calicut, Kerala.
Babu, M. Devendra, D Rajasekhar and R Manjula (2011), Role of Grama Sabha in the Implementation of MGNREGS: Field Insights from Karnataka, The Grassroots Governance Journal, Vol. IX, No. 2.
Beseley, Timothy, Pande, Rohini and Rao, Vijayendra (2008), The Political Economy of Gram Panchayats in South India. In: Gopal K. Kadekodi, Ravi Kanbur and Vijayendra Rao (Eds.) Development in Karnataka: Challenges of Governance, Equity and Empowerment. Academic Foundation, New Delhi.
Beseley, Timothy, Pande, Rohini and Rao, Vijayendra (2008), The Political Economy of Gram Panchayats in South India. In: Gopal K. Kadekodi, Ravi Kanbur and Vijayendra Rao (Eds.) Development in Karnataka: Challenges of Governance, Equity and Empowerment, Academic Foundation, New Delhi.
Bhargava, B. S. and Raphel, C. Jos (1994), Working of Grama Sabhas in Karnataka: A Study at Micro Level, Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 13 (2): 145 to 158.
Blair, Harry (2000), “Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries,†World Development (28): 1, pp.21-39.
Crook, Richard C. and Alan Sturla Sverrisson (2001),“Decentralisation and Poverty Alleviation in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis or, is West Bengal Unique?†IDS Working Paper 130, Brighton, Institute of Development Studies.
Crook, Richard C. and James Manor (1998), Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
GoK (2002), Report of the Working Group on Decentralisation, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Government of Karnataka.
Inbanathan, Anand (2000), Power, Patronage and Accountability in the Panchayats of Karnataka, ISEC Working Paper No.68, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru.
Inbanathan, Anand (2001), Representation and Accountability in Local Government: The Panchayats of Karnataka, ISEC Working Paper No.96, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru.
Johnson, Craig (2001), Local Democracy, Democratic Decentralisation and Rural Development: Theories, Challenges and Options for Policy, Development Policy Review, Vol. 19, Issue 4.
Kulipossa, (2004), ‘Decentralization and Democracy in Developing Countries: An Overview’, Development in Practice, Vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 768-779.
Manor, James (1999), The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralisation, Directions in Development Series, Washington DC, World Bank.
Oates, Wallace, E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oommen, M A (2002), ‘Rationalising Fiscal Federalism vis-à -vis Rural Local Governments’ Panchayati Raj Update, September.
Planning Commission (2002), ‘Five Year Plan 2002-2007’, Government of India.
Puliani, Satpal (Editor) (2014), The Karnataka Panchayat Raj Mannual, 6th Edition, Volumes 1 and 2, Bengaluru, Karnataka Law Journal Publications.
Rajasekhar, D. (2012), Local Self-Government in India: An Overview, Management Review, Vol.6, Issue 1, July.
Rajasekhar, D., M. Devendra Babu and R. Manjula (2012), Report on Elite and Programme Capture in Grama Panchayats of Karnataka, Centre for Decentralisation and Development, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru (mimeo).
Robinson, Mark, (1998), ‘Democracy, Participation, and Public Policy: The Politics of Institutional Design’, In: Mark Robinson and Gordon White (Eds.) (1998), ‘The Democratic Developmental State: Political and Institutional Design’, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rondinelli Dennis A (1983), Implementing Decentralisation Programmes in Asia: A Comparative Analysis, Public Administration and Development. Volume 3. pp. 181-207.
Rondinelli, Dennis, J. S. McCullough and R.W. Johnson. (1989), “Analyzing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: A Political Economy Framework,†Development and Change (20): 1, pp.57-87.
Sharma C.K. (2006), ‘Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring The Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes’, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 49-64.
Sivanna, N. and Gayathridevi, K. G. (2012), Political Inclusion and Participation of Women in Local Governance: A Study in Karnataka, Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 31, No.2, pp. 193-210.
Sivanna, N (2014), Politics of Exclusion: The Case of Scheduled Castes in the Panchayats of Karnataka, Social Change, 44 (1): 39-66.
