Development of Sustainable Livelihood Security Index for Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Uttar Pradesh, India

Authors

  • Surendra Singh Faculty, ICAR- National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, DPS Marg, PUSA, New Delhi
  • Sanatan Nayak Professor, Department of Economics, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2020/v39/i1/125991

Keywords:

Sustainable Livelihood Security Index, Agro-Climatic Zones, Regional Disparities.

Abstract

The present study has attempted to examine the livelihood status of nine agro-climatic zones (ACZs) in the State of Uttar Pradesh in India. The United National Development Programme’s (UNDP) methodology has adopted to develop a practical, innovative and ready-to-use sustainable livelihood security index (SLSI) for different ACZs. A total of 84 rational indicators were employed that covered seven dimensions of livelihood security, i.e. infrastructure security, agricultural sustainability, economic security, social security, food security, environmental security, and health security. The quintile estimation was also employed to identify low productive districts with reference to Uttar Pradesh. The performance of ACZs in terms of estimated indices for different dimensions of SLSI has also compared and ranked across developmental indicators. Study findings revealed that Bundelkhand zone has the lowest livelihood security than that of other ACZs. Least access of basic amenities, least social and health security, and higher reliance on agriculture for livelihoods were the main influencing indicators responsible for lower livelihood security in Bundelkhand zone. At the same time, better infrastructural and health facilities and least reliance on agriculture for livelihoods were main contributing indicators for the highest livelihood security in Vindhyan Zone. The present study’s findings also matched with the results of studies conducted by the Planning Commission and NITI Aayog. The policy insights from the analysis suggest the need for prioritising vulnerable and less developed ACZs to arrest regional imbalances, prevent overexploitation and to leverage the unutilised potential of the districts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Singh, S., & Nayak, S. (2020). Development of Sustainable Livelihood Security Index for Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Rural Development, 39(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2020/v39/i1/125991

Author Biography

Surendra Singh, Faculty, ICAR- National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, DPS Marg, PUSA, New Delhi

Research Associate

References

Aggarwal, Bina. (1983).Mechanisation in Indian Agriculture: An Analytical Study based on Punjab (Delhi School of Economics, Monograph in Economic, No.6), New Delhi, Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

Appleton, H. (1993).Technology and RNR-based small enterprises. Paper presented to DFID’s NRAC, Swansea, U.K.

Balishter, V.K. Gupta and Singh, R. (1991).Impact of Mechanisation on Employment and Farm Productivity. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(3): pp. 484-489.

Chopra, Kusum. (1974).Tractorisation and Changes in Factor Inputs: A Case Study of Punjab.Economic and Political Weekly, 9(52), pp. A119-A121+A123-A127.

FAO. (2018). India at a glance, data retrieved from <http://www.fao.org/india/fao-in-india/india-at-aglance/ en> on 15-03-2018.

FICCI. (2011). Agricultural Machinery Sector in India, Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. e-book retrieved from

FICCI. (2015). Transforming Agriculture through Mechanisation - a Knowledge Paper on Indian farm equipment sector. Grant Thornton International LLP, pp 01-56.

Jose, A. V. (1984).Farm Mechanisation in Asian Countries - Some Perspectives.Economic and Political Weekly, 19(26), pp. A97-A103.

Odisha Economic Survey 2016-17. (Feb 2017). Planning and Convergence Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics Government of Odisha, pp 01-369.

Ou,Y., Yang D., and Zhang, Y. (2002).Experience and Analysis on SugarcaneMechanisation at a state farm in China. ASAE Annual International Meeting/CIGR XV World Congress sponsored by ASAE CIGR, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Illinois, USA My 28 - My 31, 2002.

Pathak, B.S., Panesar, B.S., Singh, C.P. and Verma S.R. (1978).Effect of Power Sources on Production and Productivity in Ludhiana District - A Survey Report, ISAE North Chapter & ISAE, PAU, Ludhiana, pp 34-44.

Rao, C.H. Hanumantha. (1972).Farm Mechanisation in a Labour – Abundant Economy.Economic and Political Weekly, 7(5/7) pp. 393+395 - 397+399 - 400.

Singh, Gajendra (2001),Relation between Mechanisation and Agricultural Productivity in Various Parts of India, AMA, 32(2), pp. 68-76.

Singh, Gajendra (2015), Agricultural Mechanisation Development in India.Indian Journal of Agriculture Economy, Vol.70, No.1, pp 64-82.

Starkey, P. (1998).Integrating Mechanisation into Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture, Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

USDA. (2011). India: Basic information, United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service, United States.

Wobst, P. and Mhamba, R. (2000).Towards Agricultural Development and Poverty Alleviation in Tanzania: Some Policy Options, Trade and Macro Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C.