Access and Determinants of Formal Agriculture Credit In Uttar Pradesh, India

Authors

  • Surendra Singh Jatav Assistant Professor,Department of Economics, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sanatan Nayak Professor, Department of Economics, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2022/v41/i2/172905

Keywords:

Indebtedness, Nsso, Rural Credit, Logistic Regression Model, Uttar Pradesh, Regional Credit Disparities .

Abstract

The study has attempted to examine the determinants of formal agricultural credit in rural Uttar Pradesh using National Sample Survey Organisation data from the 70th round (2012–13). The Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) model is used to examine the determinants of formal credit in Uttar Pradesh. Socio-economic and demographic characteristics such as age, gender, social group, and family size are grouped into social, economic, and extension services. The findings from this study revealed that indebtedness exists and that almost 45 per cent of farmers have taken credit from informal credit agencies. Further, there is significant heterogeneity in terms of socio-economic and demographic features among farmers who have taken credit from formal and informal credit agencies. The BLR results show that gender, literacy rate, operated area, bank account, livestock, and Kisan Credit Card are key social and economic determinants of formal credit in rural Uttar Pradesh. The calculated odds ratio shows a 2.008 times higher probability of literate male farmers taking a loan from formal credit than others. Likewise, there is a 3.10 times higher probability of taking formal credit if farmers follow technical advice provided by agricultural universities, NGOs, and scientists through open-source platforms. Hence, the following policies are suggested to deal with indebtedness: (i) Policymakers can choose to intervene in the rural credit lending system by liberalising policy to more accurately reflect the characteristics of potential borrowers and in light of their current borrowing strategies, (ii) the BLR results depict a positive relationship with land size, and agricultural households with larger land seem to get more benefits. Therefore, the government should focus on marginal and small farmers, who have larger shares in the total operational landholdings, (iii) safety net programmes like the Public Distribution System (ration cards), in the presence of formal credit, may induce farmers and their families to increase their per capita monthly consumption expenditures, and (vi) State intervention is also required in terms of increasing the size of livestock, as this can be an area where Uttar Pradesh can lead the other States as this will help in diversification in the field of agriculture .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-05-11

How to Cite

Jatav, S. S., & Nayak, S. (2023). Access and Determinants of Formal Agriculture Credit In Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Rural Development, 41(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2022/v41/i2/172905

References

Amanullah, Ghulam, R.L., Siraj, A. Ch., Habibullah, M., Mansoor, A.K., Jing, W. & Naseer, A. Ch. (2020). Credit Constraints and Rural Farmers’ Welfare in an Agrarian Economy. Heliyon, 6: e05252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05252

Bedru, B.B. & Motunrayo, A.O (2022). Agricultural Credit Constrains in Smallholder Farming in Developing Countries: Evidence from Nigeria. World Development Sustainability, 1: 100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100012

Croppenstedt, A., M. Demeke & M. M., Meschi (2003). Technology adoption in the presence of Constraints: The Case of Fertilizer demand in Ethiopia. Review of Development Economics, 7(1): 58-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00175

GoI (2020). Agricultural Statistics at Glance 2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, 1-23.

Gujarati, N.D. (2004). Basic Econometrics. 4 th edition. Tata McGraw Hill Company Inc., New York, USA.

Himanshu & Kundu S. (2016). Rural Wages in India: Recent trends and Determinants. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 59(2): 217-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-017-0052-9

Jatav, S.S., Kumar, A. & Malik, B.B. (2021a). Impact of Covid-19 on the Livelihood of Rural Farmers in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Rural Development, 40(1): 94-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2021/v40/i1/166505

Jatav, S.S., Nayak, S.Singh, N. P. & Naik., K. (2022). Measuring and Mapping Food Security status of Rajasthan, India: A district-level Analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6(4): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.831396

Kumar A., Mishra, A. K., Saroj, S. & Joshi, P.K (2017). Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on Impact from a National Farmers’ Survey. Economic Systems, 41(3), 420-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.005

NABARD (2016), NABARD All India Rural Financial Inclusion Survey 2016-17. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai, India.

Natayanan, S. (2016). The Productivity of Agricultural Credit in India. Agricultural Economics, 47, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12239

NSSO (2013). Key Indicators of Debt and Investment in India (2013). Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, National Sample Survey Office, Government of India, New Delhi.

Patil, B.V. (2008). Agricultural Indebtedness: Crisis and Revival. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(5): 47-52.

Pattanayak, U. & Mallick, M. (2016). Incidence of farmers’ indebtedness and suicide in Odisha: An Analysis. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies , 3(3): 1-12.

Rawat, V.K., Shukla, A., Mohan, M., Kumar, J. & Singh, A. (2010). Emerging scenario of Risk, Indebtedness and Farmers Suicides in Agrarian Food Security Crises of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3): 521-522.

Sajjad, H. & Chauhan, C. (2012). Agrarian distress and Indebtedness in Rural India: Emerging Perspectives and Challenges Ahead. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 5(15): 397-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP11.107

Singh, S. & Toor, M.S. (2005). Agrarian Crisis with Special Reference to Indebtedness among Punjab Farmers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3): 335-346.

Singh, S. (2018). Land Inequality and Agricultural Sustainability in Uttar Pradesh, India: A Regional Analysis. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(11): 923-932.

Singh, S. (2019). Soil Health Security in India: Insights from Soil Health Card Data. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(3): 322-325.

Singh, S. (2020a). Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change and Adaptation Decisions: A Micro-level Analysis of Farmers in Bundelkhand Region. Ecological Indicators, 116: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106475

Singh, S. (2020b). Bridging the Gap between Biophysical and Social Vulnerability in Rural India: The Community Livelihood Vulnerability Approach. Area Development & Policy, 5(4): 390-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1734473

Singh, S. & Nayak, S. (2020). Development of Sustainable Livelihood Security Index for different Agro-climatic Zones of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Rural Development, 39(1): 110-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2020/v39/i1/125991

Subbarao, D. (2012). Agricultural Credit: Accomplishments and Challenges. Speech delivered at NABARD, July 12, 2012.

Wossen, T., T. Abdoulaye, A. Alene, M.G. Haile, S. Feleke, A. Olanrewaju & V. Many-ong (2017). Impacts Extension Access and Cooperative Membership on Technology Adoption and Household Welfare. Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 223-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022